Aquapump Industries vs Ashok Kumar Maheshwari Advocate - G N KHANCHANDANI — COMMP/136/2025

Case under Trade Marks Act Section section57. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020161002025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

23-05-2025

Filing Number

COMMP/16099/2025

Filing Date

23-05-2025

Registration No

COMMP/136/2025

Registration Date

15-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

TRADE MARKS ACT Section section57

Petitioner(s)

Aquapump Industries

Adv. Mahesh Mahadgut

Aquasub Engineering

Adv. Mahesh Mahadgut

Respondent(s)

Ashok Kumar Maheshwari Advocate - G N KHANCHANDANI

The Registrar of Trade Marks

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

04-08-2025

FOR DIRECTION

03-09-2025

FOR DIRECTION

24-09-2025

FOR DIRECTION

24-09-2025

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

08-04-2026

HIGH ON BOARD -

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

The Bombay High Court (Commercial Division) found prima facie merit in Aquapump Industries' petition against Ashok Kumar Maheshwari and was inclined to allow it. The respondent did not oppose the petition but sought time for instructions, leading the court to adjourn the matter to 8th April 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Commercial Division) found prima facie merit in Aquapump Industries' petition against Ashok Kumar Maheshwari and was inclined to allow it. The respondent did not oppose the petition but sought time for instructions, leading the court to adjourn the matter to 8th April 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case