INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AMOL B SHINDE vs MEHTAB AHMED MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN AND ANR. — EXA/1818/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020159972020

Filing Number

EXA/9505/2020

Filing Date

19-Dec-2020

Registration No

EXA/1818/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AMOL B SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEHTAB AHMED MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN AND ANR.

  2. 2.MOHD NAYEEMUDDIN ANSARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Indusind Bank's execution application and set aside the arbitral award because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent (Bhadra International case). The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , National Lok Adalat

  5. 25-Sep-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  6. 25-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1818/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Indusind Bank's execution application and set aside the arbitral award because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent (Bhadra International case). The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case