Maya Vikas Vaidya vs Vasudha Moreshwar Joshi — HCBM20159882026

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 261. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020159882026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/15988/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 261

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maya Vikas Vaidya

    Adv. TRIGOON S PATWARDHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasudha Moreshwar Joshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Maya Vikas Vaidya's post-grant amendment application in this testamentary matter concerning the estate of Vasudha Moreshwar Joshi (deceased). The court found no impediment to the amendment and directed the original grant be submitted to the Department within one week for processing the amendments per the attached schedule, with a fresh amended grant to be issued within two weeks thereafter. Re-verification was dispensed with and the court emphasized the fresh grant should not be delayed, subject to compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Maya Vikas Vaidya's post-grant amendment application in this testamentary matter concerning the estate of Vasudha Moreshwar Joshi (deceased). The court found no impediment to the amendment and directed the original grant be submitted to the Department within one week for processing the amendments per the attached schedule, with a fresh amended grant to be issued within two weeks thereafter. Re-verification was dispensed with and the court emphasized the fresh grant should not be delayed, subject to compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case