Hemant Jayantilal Bhuta vs Chandrika Jayantilal Bhuta widow of Jayantilal Mohanlal Bhuta — CHOL/376/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020159752026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
CHOL/15975/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
CHOL/376/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hemant Jayantilal Bhuta
Adv. Paresh More
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandrika Jayantilal Bhuta widow of Jayantilal Mohanlal Bhuta
-
2.Jiten Jayantilal Bhuta
-
3.Tushar Jayantilal Bhuta,
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary: CHOL/376/2026 The court granted the applicant's Chamber Order to set aside the previous rejection order dated 16.09.2025. The 209-day delay in filing was condoned based on the advocate's health issues and personal difficulties. The petitioner is directed to remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks from the order's upload date, failing which the petition will be rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Hearing And Final Disposal
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CHOL/376/2026
Case Summary: CHOL/376/2026 The court granted the applicant's Chamber Order to set aside the previous rejection order dated 16.09.2025. The 209-day delay in filing was condoned based on the advocate's health issues and personal difficulties. The petitioner is directed to remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks from the order's upload date, failing which the petition will be rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts