JAYESH RAMESH KALOLA vs BAPAAJI ENTERPRISES — HCBM20159382026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020159382026

e-Filing Number

01-05-2026

Filing Number

LPETN/15938/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYESH RAMESH KALOLA

    Adv. Prayag Bharat Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAPAAJI ENTERPRISES

  2. 2.DHARMENDRA BABULAL JINDAL

  3. 3.KISHORE FUTARMAL PAREKH

  4. 4.AMIT ASHOKKUMAR BAKSHI

  5. 5.SADHANA BHARAT KALOLA

  6. 6.PINAK BHARAT KALOLA

  7. 7.RIDDHI JALAY PATEL

  8. 8.JATIN RAMESH KALOLA

  9. 9.RAKESH RAMESH VYAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    - Leave Petition -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court adjourned the leave petition seeking jurisdiction to file a commercial suit challenging a termination notice dated 26th March 2025. The court noted that while petitioner's counsel sought leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent to establish jurisdiction (since defendants are outside the court's territorial jurisdiction), the plaint lacked specific averments regarding this leave requirement. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 to allow amendment of the plaint after petitioner's counsel failed to amend it by the initially scheduled date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  5. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  6. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court adjourned the leave petition seeking jurisdiction to file a commercial suit challenging a termination notice dated 26th March 2025. The court noted that while petitioner's counsel sought leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent to establish jurisdiction (since defendants are outside the court's territorial jurisdiction), the plaint lacked specific averments regarding this leave requirement. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 to allow amendment of the plaint after petitioner's counsel failed to amend it by the initially scheduled date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case