KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. NARAYAN R AWATE vs HOLLYWOOD OPTICIANS PVT. LTD. AND ANR — EXA/2439/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020158012022

Filing Number

EXA/15797/2022

Filing Date

13-May-2022

Registration No

EXA/2439/2024

Registration Date

02-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. NARAYAN R AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOLLYWOOD OPTICIANS PVT. LTD. AND ANR

  2. 2.SALEEM R SARANG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from new limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 13-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2439/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from new limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case