ARPANA JOHN HANCHINMANI vs SUNEELA JOHN HANCHINMANI alias SUNEETA JOHN HANCHINMANI — TP/2605/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020157882026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/15788/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2605/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARPANA JOHN HANCHINMANI

    Adv. VILAS B KADU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNEELA JOHN HANCHINMANI alias SUNEETA JOHN HANCHINMANI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2605/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard petitioner Arpana John Hanchinmani's petition and adjourned the matter for compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify any cross petitions. The case was granted liberty to be re-listed for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2605/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard petitioner Arpana John Hanchinmani's petition and adjourned the matter for compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify any cross petitions. The case was granted liberty to be re-listed for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case