Dy Chief Electrical Engineer Construction Central Railway JAYARAM PANDIAN vs Quality Engineers and contractors — CARBP/583/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020157872026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/15787/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARBP/583/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dy Chief Electrical Engineer Construction Central Railway JAYARAM PANDIAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Quality Engineers and contractors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted the Dy Chief Electrical Engineer Construction Central Railway's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the arbitral tribunal's mandate by two months until July 31, 2026. Both parties jointly requested the extension considering the stage of arbitral proceedings, which the court approved based on the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/583/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted the Dy Chief Electrical Engineer Construction Central Railway's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the arbitral tribunal's mandate by two months until July 31, 2026. Both parties jointly requested the extension considering the stage of arbitral proceedings, which the court approved based on the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case