ASMA MOHAMMED BAIG ALIAS ASMA SHAHID SHAIKH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPT — HCBM20157232026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020157232026

Filing Number

WP/15723/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT ( 50 )

Sub-Category

Housing Area Development ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASMA MOHAMMED BAIG ALIAS ASMA SHAHID SHAIKH

    Adv. V SHUKLA AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPT

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THOUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT AND CEO

  3. 3.DEPUTY CHIEF OFFICER, MBR AND R BOARD MHADA

  4. 4.CHIEF OFFICER, MBR AND R BOARD MHADA

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (D-3 DIVISION) MHADA

  6. 6.ABIL BUILDCON LLP

  7. 7.ZAIBA HASAN TALIYA

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Asma Mohammed Baig challenged the non-hearing of her appeal by MHADA's Chief Officer. The Bombay High Court found that notice for the appeal hearing had already been issued, rendering the challenge moot. The writ petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Asma Mohammed Baig challenged the non-hearing of her appeal by MHADA's Chief Officer. The Bombay High Court found that notice for the appeal hearing had already been issued, rendering the challenge moot. The writ petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case