ASMA MOHAMMED BAIG ALIAS ASMA SHAHID SHAIKH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPT — HCBM20157232026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020157232026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/15723/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT ( 50 )

Sub-Category

Housing Area Development ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ASMA MOHAMMED BAIG ALIAS ASMA SHAHID SHAIKH

Adv. V SHUKLA AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPT

MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THOUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT AND CEO

DEPUTY CHIEF OFFICER, MBR AND R BOARD MHADA

CHIEF OFFICER, MBR AND R BOARD MHADA

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (D-3 DIVISION) MHADA

ABIL BUILDCON LLP

ZAIBA HASAN TALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

08-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Case Summary: Petitioner Asma Mohammed Baig challenged the non-hearing of her appeal by MHADA's Chief Officer. The Bombay High Court found that notice for the appeal hearing had already been issued, rendering the challenge moot. The writ petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Asma Mohammed Baig challenged the non-hearing of her appeal by MHADA's Chief Officer. The Bombay High Court found that notice for the appeal hearing had already been issued, rendering the challenge moot. The writ petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case