SIS LIMITED formerly Security Intelligence Services India Ltd VAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES vs Union of India and Others — WP/2624/2026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 74. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020156712026
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/15671/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
WP/2624/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIS LIMITED formerly Security Intelligence Services India Ltd VAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India and Others
Superintendent R V Division VI COST and Cx Mumbai west
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 09-07-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2624/2026 The Bombay High Court (Suman Shyam & Advait M. Sethna, JJ.) on 8th June 2026 granted SIS Limited's petition by tagging it with similar pending writ petitions before a Larger Bench scheduled for July 2026. The Court issued an ad-interim order restraining Revenue Authorities from taking any coercive action against the Petitioner, with the State's consent. Respondents were directed to file their reply within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2624/2026 The Bombay High Court (Suman Shyam & Advait M. Sethna, JJ.) on 8th June 2026 granted SIS Limited's petition by tagging it with similar pending writ petitions before a Larger Bench scheduled for July 2026. The Court issued an ad-interim order restraining Revenue Authorities from taking any coercive action against the Petitioner, with the State's consent. Respondents were directed to file their reply within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts