The Peoples Education Society vs State of Maharashtra, Advocate - GP OS, ,GP OS,GP OS — WP/637/2026
Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020156662025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-05-2025
Filing Number
WP/15666/2025
Filing Date
19-05-2025
Registration No
WP/637/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
UNIVERSITY ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Peoples Education Society
Adv. MUZAFFAR Y PATEL,Aarti R Dharamsey,Aarti R Dharamsey, ,Aarti R Dharamsey
Siddharth College of Law
Adv. Aarti R Dharamsey
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra, Advocate - GP OS, ,GP OS,GP OS
Joint Director of Higher Education
Adv. GP OS
University of Mumbai
Adv. Rui Rodrigues
K Sudhakar Reddy
Adv. V B TIWARI,MOHINI A REHPADE
University Grants Commission through Secretary
Adv. Rui Rodrigues
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-06-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 02-07-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 05-08-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 24-09-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 15-10-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay modified its April 23, 2026 order in this writ petition concerning the appointment of a regular principal. The Court amended the selection criteria by requiring adherence to "provisions, rules and regulations" instead of subjective "overall view" assessment. The respondents were granted an extended 3-week deadline to submit the proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay modified its April 23, 2026 order in this writ petition concerning the appointment of a regular principal. The Court amended the selection criteria by requiring adherence to "provisions, rules and regulations" instead of subjective "overall view" assessment. The respondents were granted an extended 3-week deadline to submit the proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts