MULJIBHAI PURUSHOTTAMDAS HUF THROUGH ITS KARTA VIZ MR. MAHESH MULJIBHAI ZAVERI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — HCBM20156532025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020156532025

Filing Number

WP/15653/2025

Filing Date

19-May-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MULJIBHAI PURUSHOTTAMDAS HUF THROUGH ITS KARTA VIZ MR. MAHESH MULJIBHAI ZAVERI

    Adv. Sujit Lahoti and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.DESIGNATED OFFICER (B AND F) B-WARD

  4. 4.CHIEF ENGINEER (D.P.)

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    This order concerns multiple petitions (WPL/15082/2025 through WPL/15653/2025) before the Bombay High Court. The court, by way of last chance, directed petitioners to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within four weeks, failing which the petitions shall stand rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

  4. 19-May-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This order concerns multiple petitions (WPL/15082/2025 through WPL/15653/2025) before the Bombay High Court. The court, by way of last chance, directed petitioners to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within four weeks, failing which the petitions shall stand rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case