Sultana Ahmad Kathrada Wife of Basheer Mahmud Timol SEEMA HUNNURKAR AND ASSOCIATES vs Ahmode Mohamed Kathrada alias Ahmed Mohamed Kathrada alias Amode Mohamed Kahrada alias Ahmad — TP/2866/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020156502026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/15650/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
TP/2866/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sultana Ahmad Kathrada Wife of Basheer Mahmud Timol SEEMA HUNNURKAR AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ahmode Mohamed Kathrada alias Ahmed Mohamed Kathrada alias Amode Mohamed Kahrada alias Ahmad
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/2866/2026 The Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) on 15 June 2026 called the testamentary petition for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue notice to non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross-petition was filed. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after all compliance requirements are satisfied and the matter is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2866/2026
Case Summary: TP/2866/2026 The Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) on 15 June 2026 called the testamentary petition for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue notice to non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross-petition was filed. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after all compliance requirements are satisfied and the matter is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts