AUM SERENITY MARKAND GANDHI AND CO vs Nandita Co Operative Housing Society Ltd — HCBM20156352026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020156352026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/15635/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Interim Relief ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AUM SERENITY MARKAND GANDHI AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandita Co Operative Housing Society Ltd
-
2.Dr Snehal Sunil Mehta
Adv. SINGH ABHIJIT SUBHASH
-
3.Truegraph Charts Pvt Ltd
-
4.Vijay Raheja
-
5.Nitesh Kapadia
-
6.Janvi Kapadia
Adv. Link legal
-
7.Jheel Kapadia
Adv. Link legal
-
8.Seema Amitabh Shah
Adv. RMG Law Associates
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
Case Summary AUM SERENITY MARKAND GANDHI AND CO v. Nandita Co-operative Housing Society Ltd (CARBP(L) No. 15635 of 2026) The Bombay High Court granted interim relief in this arbitration petition arising from a Development Agreement dispute. The court approved an agreed settlement for Flat No.B/7 where Respondents 5, 6, and 8 (legal heirs of a deceased member) agreed to vacate in exchange for transit rent payable to Respondent 5, joint PAA rights, and equal distribution of hardship compensation. Regarding Flat No.A-1 (disputed by Respondents 2-4), the court granted liberty to approach the Vacation Court either upon settlement or if negotiations fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Case Summary AUM SERENITY MARKAND GANDHI AND CO v. Nandita Co-operative Housing Society Ltd (CARBP(L) No. 15635 of 2026) The Bombay High Court granted interim relief in this arbitration petition arising from a Development Agreement dispute. The court approved an agreed settlement for Flat No.B/7 where Respondents 5, 6, and 8 (legal heirs of a deceased member) agreed to vacate in exchange for transit rent payable to Respondent 5, joint PAA rights, and equal distribution of hardship compensation. Regarding Flat No.A-1 (disputed by Respondents 2-4), the court granted liberty to approach the Vacation Court either upon settlement or if negotiations fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts