M Vijay Gopal SUJIT LAHOTI AND ASSOCIATES vs Pioneer Infotech Private Limited Advocate - CHIRAG CHANANI — CARBP/514/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 15(1)(a). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020156142026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/15614/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARBP/514/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 15(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Vijay Gopal SUJIT LAHOTI AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pioneer Infotech Private Limited Advocate - CHIRAG CHANANI

  2. 2.Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed M. Vijay Gopal's petition to substitute the arbitrator in a dispute with Pioneer Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The originally appointed arbitrator declined the assignment via email on April 1, 2026, prompting the court to appoint Ms. Payal Vardhan as substitute arbitrator. The court directed parties to appear before the new arbitrator for procedural directions and reserved all merits issues for the tribunal's consideration, with arbitrator fees to be shared equally and subject to final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/514/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed M. Vijay Gopal's petition to substitute the arbitrator in a dispute with Pioneer Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The originally appointed arbitrator declined the assignment via email on April 1, 2026, prompting the court to appoint Ms. Payal Vardhan as substitute arbitrator. The court directed parties to appear before the new arbitrator for procedural directions and reserved all merits issues for the tribunal's consideration, with arbitrator fees to be shared equally and subject to final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case