SARITA SURESH PATIL vs DMK PERTOTRADERS AND CARRIERS PVT LTD — IA/2566/2026

Case under Companies (Disqualification of Directors Under Section 274(1)(G) of the Companies Act 1956) Rules Section 433434439. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020155482026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/15548/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/2566/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies (Disqualification of Directors Under Section 274(1)(G) of the Companies Act 1956) Rules Section 433434439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARITA SURESH PATIL

    Adv. CHETAN MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DMK PERTOTRADERS AND CARRIERS PVT LTD

  2. 2.THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Sarita Suresh Patil's interim application seeking disbursement of Rs. 4,23,740/- (an adjudicated amount of a deceased ex-workman) from the Official Liquidator of Shree Venkatesh Steels Ltd. The Official Liquidator did not oppose the application but stipulated that disbursement must follow due process, requiring the applicant to submit an affidavit-cum-indemnity bond in the prescribed format, which the applicant agreed to comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2566/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Sarita Suresh Patil's interim application seeking disbursement of Rs. 4,23,740/- (an adjudicated amount of a deceased ex-workman) from the Official Liquidator of Shree Venkatesh Steels Ltd. The Official Liquidator did not oppose the application but stipulated that disbursement must follow due process, requiring the applicant to submit an affidavit-cum-indemnity bond in the prescribed format, which the applicant agreed to comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case