JAIN SONS FINLEASE LTD vs AMBICA SHIPPING AGENCY AND 3 ORS — EXA/1166/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020155472022

Filing Number

EXA/15543/2022

Filing Date

10-May-2022

Registration No

EXA/1166/2023

Registration Date

03-Aug-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAIN SONS FINLEASE LTD

    Adv. rhshetty,kiran pahwa,kiran pahwa, ,kiran pahwa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMBICA SHIPPING AGENCY AND 3 ORS

  2. 2.ANKITA TILAK LODAYA

  3. 3.DHWANI TILAK LODAYA

  4. 4.TILAK VERSHI LODAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application filed by Jain Sons Finlease Ltd. against Ambica Shipping Agency, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International. The arbitral award was set aside, but the parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  4. 10-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1166/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application filed by Jain Sons Finlease Ltd. against Ambica Shipping Agency, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International. The arbitral award was set aside, but the parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case