JERRY FRANCIS GOMES AND 7 OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - Vijay D Patil, RESP. NO. 5 ,GP OS,RES. NO. 1 2 3 4,SURESH CHANDRAKANT MORE,RESP NO.8,-,- — WP/1572/2016
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020154702016
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/1666/2016
Filing Date
21-06-2016
Registration No
WP/1572/2016
Registration Date
08-07-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JERRY FRANCIS GOMES AND 7 OTHERS
Adv. ANIL R MISHRA
VELANKANI TORRENT MENDONSA
FEDA JOSEPH GEORGE
DELETED AS PER ORD. DT.14/08/2019 and 11/09/
VERUNICA JOKIM GOMES
JUDE JOKIM GOMES
DOMNIC JOKIM GOMES
M/S SHRII HARI DEVELOPERS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - Vijay D Patil, RESP. NO. 5 ,GP OS,RES. NO. 1 2 3 4,SURESH CHANDRAKANT MORE,RESP NO.8,-,-
THE DY. COLLECTOR (ENC/REM) AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (ENC. AND REM.) AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
SHAH COLONY RAHIVASI SANGH CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROP)(Legal Heir)
Adv. RAJESH JANARDAN GHAG,Karansingh Shekhawat6.
GULAB BABAJI MORE
Adv. RAJESH JANARDAN GHAG,Karansingh Shekhawat6.
NAMDEO TUKARAM PATEKAR
Adv. RAJESH JANARDAN GHAG,Karansingh Shekhawat
SMT. HEMLATA HANSRAJ SHAH W/D HANSRAJ SHAMJI SHAH
M/S. LAXMI CONSTRUCTION PROP. UMAKANT BALIRAM THAKUR
Adv. VIJAY SUHAS GHARAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH
FOR ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR DIRECTION
DUE ADMISSION - 2
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-11-2016 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH |
| 18-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 25-09-2025 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 14-08-2024 | DUE ADMISSION - 2 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 1572/2016 was adjourned due to paucity of time during court vacation. Although petitioner's counsel requested final disposal, the High Court of Bombay found it impossible to hear the petition before the vacation period and listed the matter for hearing on 18/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 1572/2016 was adjourned due to paucity of time during court vacation. Although petitioner's counsel requested final disposal, the High Court of Bombay found it impossible to hear the petition before the vacation period and listed the matter for hearing on 18/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts