TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD) OM GUJAR LAW CHAMBERS vs SHAHNAWAZ ANSARI — HCBM20154352025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020154352025

Filing Number

EXA/15435/2025

Filing Date

14-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD) OM GUJAR LAW CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAHNAWAZ ANSARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 903-1091) in cases involving Tata Capital Limited vs. Shahnawaz Ansari and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Aug-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  4. 14-Aug-2025

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  5. 14-May-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 903-1091) in cases involving Tata Capital Limited vs. Shahnawaz Ansari and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case