Durgasingh Lalsingh Deora vs Vijay Krishnaji Sawant — CARBP/578/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29-A(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020154182026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/15418/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CARBP/578/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Durgasingh Lalsingh Deora
Adv. Amit Mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay Krishnaji Sawant
-
2.Vaibhav Vijay Sawant
-
3.Anand Ramchandra Naik
-
4.Nirmala Ramchandra Naik
-
5.Vaibhav Development Corporation
-
6.Vishakha Chowgule
-
7.Vicky Vijay Sawant
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner Durgasingh Lalsingh Deora's request to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The tribunal's original mandate had expired on January 31, 2026, and the court extended it for six months until November 30, 2026, based on the parties' joint request considering the stage of the arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CARBP/578/2026
The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner Durgasingh Lalsingh Deora's request to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The tribunal's original mandate had expired on January 31, 2026, and the court extended it for six months until November 30, 2026, based on the parties' joint request considering the stage of the arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts