AUSTINE NICHOLAS FERNANDES vs Nicholas Joseph Gonsalve — HCBM20154012025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 1956. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

Next hearing 17-Mar-2026

CNR: HCBM020154012025

e-Filing Number

14-05-2025

Filing Number

TP/15401/2025

Filing Date

14-May-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 1956

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AUSTINE NICHOLAS FERNANDES

    Adv. B G Saraf

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nicholas Joseph Gonsalve

Case History

  1. 17-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Case Summary: In Petition (L) No. 15401/2025 before the Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction), the court granted petitioner Austine Nicholas Fernandes a final extension until 12.05.2026 to remove office objections and get the petition registered/numbered by filing a compliance praecipe. The petition will stand rejected for non-compliance if the objections are not resolved by the deadline under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  6. 14-May-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Petition (L) No. 15401/2025 before the Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction), the court granted petitioner Austine Nicholas Fernandes a final extension until 12.05.2026 to remove office objections and get the petition registered/numbered by filing a compliance praecipe. The petition will stand rejected for non-compliance if the objections are not resolved by the deadline under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case