M/S. INDUSIND BANK LIMITED vs JAI BABAJI TOURS TRAVELS AND ANR — EXA/2095/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested-- on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020153352016
Filing Number
EXA/1423/2016
Filing Date
18-Jun-2016
Registration No
EXA/2095/2016
Registration Date
01-Dec-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. INDUSIND BANK LIMITED
Adv. SG Legal and Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAI BABAJI TOURS TRAVELS AND ANR
-
2.SHABHAJI VILASH RAINAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (involving IndusInd Bank and others) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Oct-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. MenonView PDF
-
16-Nov-2016
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
16-Nov-2016
For Rejection [Original Side Matters]
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
18-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2095/2016
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (involving IndusInd Bank and others) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts