NAVYA NETWORK INC vs ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS Advocate - Ashutosh Misra — COMMP/24/2026

Case under Patents Act Section 117A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020153272025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

10-05-2025

Filing Number

COMMP/15327/2025

Filing Date

13-05-2025

Registration No

COMMP/24/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PATENTS ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Patents Act Section 117A

Petitioner(s)

NAVYA NETWORK INC

Adv. SONAL DOSHI AND CO

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS Advocate - Ashutosh Misra

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

22-07-2025

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

10-09-2025

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

09-12-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

10-02-2026

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

24-02-2026

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the Patent Office's rejection of Navya Network Inc.'s "Medical Research Retrieval Engine" patent application and remanded it for reconsideration. The court found the rejection order suffered from procedural defects: (1) it lacked detailed reasoning comparing the claimed invention to prior art documents, failing to follow the established five-step inventive step test; (2) it introduced new grounds regarding "self-learned ontology" not communicated in the hearing notice, violating natural justice principles; and (3) it required fresh examination of whether the invention demonstrates technical effect under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, as the current reasoning was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the Patent Office's rejection of Navya Network Inc.'s "Medical Research Retrieval Engine" patent application and remanded it for reconsideration. The court found the rejection order suffered from procedural defects: (1) it lacked detailed reasoning comparing the claimed invention to prior art documents, failing to follow the established five-step inventive step test; (2) it introduced new grounds regarding "self-learned ontology" not communicated in the hearing notice, violating natural justice principles; and (3) it required fresh examination of whether the invention demonstrates technical effect under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, as the current reasoning was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case