NAVYA NETWORK INC vs ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS Advocate - Ashutosh Misra — COMMP/24/2026
Case under Patents Act Section 117A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020153272025
e-Filing Number
10-05-2025
Filing Number
COMMP/15327/2025
Filing Date
13-05-2025
Registration No
COMMP/24/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Bench Type
Single
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PATENTS ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVYA NETWORK INC
Adv. SONAL DOSHI AND CO
Respondent(s)
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS Advocate - Ashutosh Misra
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-07-2025 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 10-09-2025 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 09-12-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 10-02-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 24-02-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the Patent Office's rejection of Navya Network Inc.'s "Medical Research Retrieval Engine" patent application and remanded it for reconsideration. The court found the rejection order suffered from procedural defects: (1) it lacked detailed reasoning comparing the claimed invention to prior art documents, failing to follow the established five-step inventive step test; (2) it introduced new grounds regarding "self-learned ontology" not communicated in the hearing notice, violating natural justice principles; and (3) it required fresh examination of whether the invention demonstrates technical effect under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, as the current reasoning was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court set aside the Patent Office's rejection of Navya Network Inc.'s "Medical Research Retrieval Engine" patent application and remanded it for reconsideration. The court found the rejection order suffered from procedural defects: (1) it lacked detailed reasoning comparing the claimed invention to prior art documents, failing to follow the established five-step inventive step test; (2) it introduced new grounds regarding "self-learned ontology" not communicated in the hearing notice, violating natural justice principles; and (3) it required fresh examination of whether the invention demonstrates technical effect under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, as the current reasoning was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts