SHRUTI CHATURVEDI Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs A TO Z BROKING SERVICES LLP — CARAP/237/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section section11. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020152992026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CARAP/15298/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
CARAP/237/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRUTI CHATURVEDI Wadia Ghandy and Co.
-
2.PRADEEP SANDEEP CORPORATE ADVISORS LLP
Adv. Wadia Ghandy and Co.
Respondent(s)
-
1.A TO Z BROKING SERVICES LLP
-
2.PRAVIN MUNDHWA
-
3.SANJEEV CHATURVEDI
-
4.M/S SHRIYAM COMMODITIES INTERMEDIARY LLP
-
5.VARSHA CHATURVEDI
-
6.BABITA CHATURVEDI
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jul-2026
For Circulation (Arbitration Petition U/S 11
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
Case Summary: CARAP/237/2026 The High Court of Bombay Commercial Division adjourned the commercial arbitration application between Shruti Chaturvedi and Pradeep Sandeep Corporate Advisors LLP (applicants) against A to Z Broking Services LLP and others (respondents). The court noted parties are exploring settlement possibilities and listed the matter for 1st July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CARAP/237/2026
Case Summary: CARAP/237/2026 The High Court of Bombay Commercial Division adjourned the commercial arbitration application between Shruti Chaturvedi and Pradeep Sandeep Corporate Advisors LLP (applicants) against A to Z Broking Services LLP and others (respondents). The court noted parties are exploring settlement possibilities and listed the matter for 1st July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts