KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. vs TRIMURTI CARGO MOVERS PVT.LTD. AND 2 ORS. — EXA/2163/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Nov-2016

CNR: HCBM020152852016

Filing Number

EXA/1414/2016

Filing Date

18-Jun-2016

Registration No

EXA/2163/2016

Registration Date

14-Dec-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

    Adv. MANMOHAN,-, -

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRIMURTI CARGO MOVERS PVT.LTD. AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.RAJIV AGARWAL

  3. 3.RAKHEE RAJIV AGARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (903-1091) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which the Supreme Court held to be void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Nov-2016

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 23-Nov-2016

    For Rejection [Original Side Matters]

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  5. 18-Jun-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2163/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (903-1091) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which the Supreme Court held to be void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case