Rajalakshmi Venkatesh Iyer LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY vs Vasanthi Sambasivan wife of Ayalur Parameswaran Sambasivan alias Vasanthi Sambasivan — TP/2533/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020152052026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

27-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/15204/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

TP/2533/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

Rajalakshmi Venkatesh Iyer LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

Vasanthi Sambasivan wife of Ayalur Parameswaran Sambasivan alias Vasanthi Sambasivan

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

08-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

08-06-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case Summary: TP/2533/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th June 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation and notice to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for listing after all procedural compliances are completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2533/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th June 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation and notice to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for listing after all procedural compliances are completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case