SUMIT ASHOK VERMA NEDUMPARA AND NEDUMPARA vs RAKESH SURAJPAL SINGH — HCBM20151732025

Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM020151732025

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/15173/2025

Filing Date

09-05-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SUMIT ASHOK VERMA NEDUMPARA AND NEDUMPARA

Respondent(s)

RAKESH SURAJPAL SINGH

DIST COLLECTOR THANE

ADDITIONAL TEHSILADAR MIRA BHAYANDER

TEHSILDAR PALGHAR

MAHARERA MUMBAI

MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

14-07-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

21-07-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

24-07-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

29-07-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

01-08-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a consolidation order on multiple Writ Petitions (WPL) and Interim Applications (IAL) marked "FOR REJECTION." The court granted petitioners and applicants a final opportunity to remove office objections and file/upload compliance praecipes within four weeks from the order date. Failure to comply with this directive will result in automatic rejection of both petitions and interim applications under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a consolidation order on multiple Writ Petitions (WPL) and Interim Applications (IAL) marked "FOR REJECTION." The court granted petitioners and applicants a final opportunity to remove office objections and file/upload compliance praecipes within four weeks from the order date. Failure to comply with this directive will result in automatic rejection of both petitions and interim applications under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case