Sonu R Yadav vs Axis Bank Limited — HCBM20151492026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020151492026

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

ARBP/15149/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonu R Yadav

    Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Axis Bank Limited

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Case Summary: Sonu R Yadav v. Axis Bank Limited Outcome: The Bombay High Court quashed the impugned arbitration order and allowed the petition. The Court held that Axis Bank's unilateral appointment of an arbitrator through a third-party institution was illegal and violated Supreme Court precedent. The bank withdrew the arbitration proceedings, and the Court warned of future consequences if similar practices recur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Production At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sonu R Yadav v. Axis Bank Limited Outcome: The Bombay High Court quashed the impugned arbitration order and allowed the petition. The Court held that Axis Bank's unilateral appointment of an arbitrator through a third-party institution was illegal and violated Supreme Court precedent. The bank withdrew the arbitration proceedings, and the Court warned of future consequences if similar practices recur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case