MOHAMMED RASHID ABDUL GAFFAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - GP OS — HCBM20151142025
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020151142025
Filing Number
WP/15114/2025
Filing Date
09-May-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMED RASHID ABDUL GAFFAR
Adv. R R Varma
-
2.MOHAMMED ASLAM ABDUL GAFFAR
-
3.MOHAMMED SHAFIQUE ABDUL GAFFER
-
4.ALTAMASH NOOR MOHAMMED
-
5.SAQIB NOOR MOHAMMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - GP OS
-
2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
3.VASANT SHAMJI KENIA
Adv. deepa pohuja
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a procedural order on 26 petitions (WPL/15082/2025 through WPL/15653/2025). The court granted petitioners a final four-week extension to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes for petition registration. If petitioners fail to comply within this deadline, all petitions will be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
09-May-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a procedural order on 26 petitions (WPL/15082/2025 through WPL/15653/2025). The court granted petitioners a final four-week extension to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes for petition registration. If petitioners fail to comply within this deadline, all petitions will be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts