TIMEKEEPERS THE WATCH BOUTIQUE PVT LTD TRD ASSOCIATES vs THE UNION OF INDIA — HCBM20150932025
Case under Goods and Services Tax Act (Maharashtra) Section 122, 74. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020150932025
e-Filing Number
08-05-2025
Filing Number
WP/15093/2025
Filing Date
09-May-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIMEKEEPERS THE WATCH BOUTIQUE PVT LTD TRD ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST MUMBAI SOUTH
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE MUMBAI ZONAL UNIT
-
4.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST PALGHAR COMMISSIONERATE
-
5.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
CASE SUMMARY The High Court of Bombay issued a procedural order on 26 petitions filed by Timekeepers The Watch Boutique Pvt Ltd and TRD Associates against GST authorities. The court granted petitioners a final four-week extension to cure office objections and register/number their petitions by filing compliance documents, with automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986 if objections remain unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
09-May-2025
Case filed
CASE SUMMARY The High Court of Bombay issued a procedural order on 26 petitions filed by Timekeepers The Watch Boutique Pvt Ltd and TRD Associates against GST authorities. The court granted petitioners a final four-week extension to cure office objections and register/number their petitions by filing compliance documents, with automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986 if objections remain unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts