Jet Privilege Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — HCBM20150332026

Case under Constitution of India Section Article 14, 19 , 20, 21 and 226. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020150332026

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/15033/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article 14, 19 , 20, 21 and 226
Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section Section 74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jet Privilege Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax

  4. 4.The Commissioner of State Tax

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Jet Privilege Pvt. Ltd.'s petition challenging a GST Show Cause Notice dated 30 June 2025, holding that since the notice had already been adjudicated with a final order passed on 26 December 2025, the petitioner should pursue appellate remedies rather than writ jurisdiction. The court disposed of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within three weeks, keeping all contentions open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Jet Privilege Pvt. Ltd.'s petition challenging a GST Show Cause Notice dated 30 June 2025, holding that since the notice had already been adjudicated with a final order passed on 26 December 2025, the petitioner should pursue appellate remedies rather than writ jurisdiction. The court disposed of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within three weeks, keeping all contentions open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case