DILEEP KANNOJIA vs GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE AND 7 ORS — HCBM20149972026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020149972026

Filing Number

IA/14997/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILEEP KANNOJIA

    Adv. meraki legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE AND 7 ORS

  2. 2.ADDNL. COLLECTOR (ENCROACHMENT/DEMOLITION OF EASTERN SUBURBS) CHURCHGATE

  3. 3.CHEMBUR SUSWAGATAM CHS LTD.

  4. 4.SHREE NATHJI DEVELOPERS, THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

  5. 5.COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND LAND MANAGER MHADA

  6. 6.HOUSING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

  7. 7.ASSISTANT ENGINEER (MAINTENANCE) M/WEST

  8. 8.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, THROUGH BALASAHEB TIDKE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL)

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition No. 811 of 2025 filed by Dileep Kannojia against the Grievance Redressal Committee and others was adjourned to 29 June 2026. The petitioner did not appear in court on 11 June 2026, and Respondent No. 4's counsel was directed to serve notice on the petitioner's advocate. The court warned that if the petitioner fails to appear at the next hearing, it would pass appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 811 of 2025 filed by Dileep Kannojia against the Grievance Redressal Committee and others was adjourned to 29 June 2026. The petitioner did not appear in court on 11 June 2026, and Respondent No. 4's counsel was directed to serve notice on the petitioner's advocate. The court warned that if the petitioner fails to appear at the next hearing, it would pass appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case