ANUJA ASHOK PHATAK vs ASHOK VINAYAK PHATAK — TP/2607/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020149712026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/14971/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2607/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUJA ASHOK PHATAK

    Adv. Shirish Mathkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK VINAYAK PHATAK

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2607/2026 Outcome: Case called for directions (interim order). The court directed the petitioner's advocate to: (1) issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office; (2) file affidavit of service and furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules; and (3) verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned with liberty to re-list after all compliance requirements are met and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2607/2026 Outcome: Case called for directions (interim order). The court directed the petitioner's advocate to: (1) issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office; (2) file affidavit of service and furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules; and (3) verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned with liberty to re-list after all compliance requirements are met and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case