Yogesh Krishnakant Shroff vs Vinod Nagindas Shah alias Vinodray Nagindas Shah alias Vinodrai Nagindas Shah alias Vinodchandra Nag — TP/2612/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020149462026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
23-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/14946/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
TP/2612/2026
Registration Date
08-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Krishnakant Shroff
Adv. Agnes Baradia
Respondent(s)
Vinod Nagindas Shah alias Vinodray Nagindas Shah alias Vinodrai Nagindas Shah alias Vinodchandra Nag
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: TP/2612/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) called the testamentary petition for directions. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and ordered the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to list after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and parties are ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: TP/2612/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) called the testamentary petition for directions. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and ordered the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to list after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and parties are ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts