Shailesh Mahadev Botare vs Malati Mahadev Botare — MPT/571/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section Section2. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020149372026
e-Filing Number
24-04-2026
Filing Number
MPT/14937/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
MPT/571/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Coram
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shailesh Mahadev Botare
Adv. Prachi Raj Mhatre
Respondent(s)
-
1.Malati Mahadev Botare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Case Summary: MPT/571/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Shailesh Mahadev Botare's petition for a legal heirship certificate, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of his deceased mother, Malati Mahadev Botare (died July 12, 2018). The court held that the right to apply for a heirship certificate is a continuous right not barred by limitation, and thus condoned the delay in filing the petition. The court dispensed with the requirement for proclamation/notice since the petitioner was the only surviving legal heir and issued the certificate under Bombay Regulation Act III of 1827. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Misc. Petition For Admission / Final Hearing [Under Bombay Regulation Act ,Viii]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/571/2026
Case Summary: MPT/571/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Shailesh Mahadev Botare's petition for a legal heirship certificate, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of his deceased mother, Malati Mahadev Botare (died July 12, 2018). The court held that the right to apply for a heirship certificate is a continuous right not barred by limitation, and thus condoned the delay in filing the petition. The court dispensed with the requirement for proclamation/notice since the petitioner was the only surviving legal heir and issued the certificate under Bombay Regulation Act III of 1827. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts