PRADIP RAJARAM KADAM vs ZUBEDABI MOHAMMED ARIF AND 16 ORS — CHOL/359/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020149302026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
CHOL/14930/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
CHOL/359/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Discharge of Advocate ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRADIP RAJARAM KADAM
Adv. Pradip Kadam
Respondent(s)
ZUBEDABI MOHAMMED ARIF AND 16 ORS
KHAIRUNISA MOHAMED ARIF
ABIDABI MOHAMED ARIF
ABDUL AZIZ ARIF SINCE DECEASED(Legal Heir)4.
ISMAIL AZIZ4.
ASH FAQUE AZIZ4.
NAZMA ABDUL AZIZ
ASHABI MOHAMED ARIF
MOHAMMED HARUN ARIF
KHURSHID MOHAMMED ARIF
HAMIDABI MOHAMMED ARIF
FATIMABI MOHAMMED ARIF
FAYAZ AHEMED
AMRIT MOHANLAL PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS HEIRS VIZ MEENA AMRIT PATEL(Legal Heir)11.
MEENA AMRIT11.
ASHIT AMRIT PATEL11.
TUSHAR AMRIT PATEL
SHIVSHAKTI DEVELOPERS
PURSHOTTAM LAXMANDAS BHARADWAJ @ SHARMA
JYOTI NANDKISHOR RATHI
SHAILAJA HEMANT SHAH
HEMANT RAGHUNATHPRASAD SHAH
IMPACT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. (ORIG PLAINTIFF)
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-07-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
Orders
Case Summary: CHOL/359/2026 Advocate Pradip R. Kadam was discharged as counsel for Defendant No. 10 in Suit No. 1399/2008. The Chamber Order was allowed on 12th June 2026 because Defendant No. 10 had retrieved case papers with no objection in December 2013 to engage another advocate, and subsequent attempts to contact the defendant proved unsuccessful. The advocate's name was deleted from the suit records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CHOL/359/2026 Advocate Pradip R. Kadam was discharged as counsel for Defendant No. 10 in Suit No. 1399/2008. The Chamber Order was allowed on 12th June 2026 because Defendant No. 10 had retrieved case papers with no objection in December 2013 to engage another advocate, and subsequent attempts to contact the defendant proved unsuccessful. The advocate's name was deleted from the suit records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts