PRITI RAJEN SHARMA THAKKAR ANKITA PRAFUL vs RAJEN KAUSHIK SHARMA DECEASED — TP/2909/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020148782026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/14878/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2909/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRITI RAJEN SHARMA THAKKAR ANKITA PRAFUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJEN KAUSHIK SHARMA DECEASED

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    The testamentary petition filed by Priti Rajen Sharma Thakkar and Ankita Praful regarding the will of deceased Rajen Kaushik Sharma was called for directions on 15th June 2026. The court directed the office to issue a Citation and notice to the Collector, and the advocate must serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs via the Sheriff of Mumbai. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance is completed and cross-petition verification is done. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2909/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The testamentary petition filed by Priti Rajen Sharma Thakkar and Ankita Praful regarding the will of deceased Rajen Kaushik Sharma was called for directions on 15th June 2026. The court directed the office to issue a Citation and notice to the Collector, and the advocate must serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs via the Sheriff of Mumbai. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance is completed and cross-petition verification is done. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case