INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AMOL B. SHINDE vs ANAND JOHN ASADE AND 2 ORS. — EXA/328/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020148102020

Filing Number

EXA/8318/2020

Filing Date

08-Dec-2020

Registration No

EXA/328/2024

Registration Date

06-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AMOL B. SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAND JOHN ASADE AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.VIKRANT PAREKH

  3. 3.NELSON SOMAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previously elapsed time excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Oct-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 16-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/328/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previously elapsed time excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case