Sonal Pandya Sheth LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY vs Geeta Narendra Pandya — TP/2384/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020146482026
e-Filing Number
23-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/14648/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
TP/2384/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sonal Pandya Sheth LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY
-
2.Neesha Vinit Patel
Adv. LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Geeta Narendra Pandya
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary (TP/2384/2026): The testamentary petition filed by Sonal Pandya Sheth Lakdawala & Company and Neesha Vinit Patel against Geeta Narendra Pandya was called for directions on 6th May 2026. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements and verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to list for final hearing once all formalities are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2384/2026
Case Summary (TP/2384/2026): The testamentary petition filed by Sonal Pandya Sheth Lakdawala & Company and Neesha Vinit Patel against Geeta Narendra Pandya was called for directions on 6th May 2026. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements and verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to list for final hearing once all formalities are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts