KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED vs PREMSAGAR V SHARMA — EXA/482/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020146422022

Filing Number

EXA/14638/2022

Filing Date

04-May-2022

Registration No

EXA/482/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

    Adv. Adv M Kolamkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREMSAGAR V SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior limitation period and reserving liberty to apply if written waiver agreements exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 22-Jan-2024

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 22-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/482/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior limitation period and reserving liberty to apply if written waiver agreements exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case