ROCHELLE KAPOOR W/O VIKRAM KAPOOR vs VIKRAM SURAJMOHAN KAPOOR @ VIKRAM SURAJ KAPOOR VIKRAM S. KAPOOR(DECEASED) — TP/2252/2022

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020146352022

Filing Number

TP/14631/2022

Filing Date

04-May-2022

Registration No

TP/2252/2022

Registration Date

22-Jul-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WITHOUT WILL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROCHELLE KAPOOR W/O VIKRAM KAPOOR

    Adv. Advocate- D R Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM SURAJMOHAN KAPOOR @ VIKRAM SURAJ KAPOOR VIKRAM S. KAPOOR(DECEASED)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2252/2022 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a common conditional order on April 24, 2026, covering 104 testamentary and intestate petitions including TP/2252/2022 (Rochelle Kapoor v. Vikram Surajmohan Kapoor). Parties must remove all office objections per Rule 435 by July 15, 2026, and pay court fees; failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the petition without further notice, though exceptions apply for cases with caveats or pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal Under Rule 435

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  12. 25-Jul-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  13. 25-Jul-2024

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  14. 27-Jun-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  15. 27-Jun-2024

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  16. 09-May-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  17. 09-May-2024

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  18. 22-Apr-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  19. 22-Apr-2024

    For Amendment

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  20. 12-Apr-2024

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  21. 05-Apr-2023

    C.J. Bhatt, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

  22. 05-Jan-2023

    C.J. Bhatt, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

  23. 05-Jan-2023

    For Compliance

    C.J. Bhatt, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  24. 04-Jan-2023

    For Direction

    C.J. Bhatt, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  25. 10-Aug-2022

    C.J. Bhatt, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

  26. 10-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 04-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2252/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2252/2022 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a common conditional order on April 24, 2026, covering 104 testamentary and intestate petitions including TP/2252/2022 (Rochelle Kapoor v. Vikram Surajmohan Kapoor). Parties must remove all office objections per Rule 435 by July 15, 2026, and pay court fees; failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the petition without further notice, though exceptions apply for cases with caveats or pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case