SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs NARESH MALLESH GAJULA NARESH TOURS AND TRAVELS — EXA/883/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020146032023

Filing Number

EXA/14597/2023

Filing Date

31-May-2023

Registration No

EXA/883/2023

Registration Date

22-Jun-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. Sudhir Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARESH MALLESH GAJULA NARESH TOURS AND TRAVELS

  2. 2.RIYAZ AHMED ABDUL KHALIL SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from limitation considerations, subject to any express written waiver agreements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 31-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/883/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous arbitration period excluded from limitation considerations, subject to any express written waiver agreements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case