KOGTA FINANCIAL (INDIA) LTD. vs DHUDARAM MOTARAM GANTHILASAR — EXA/1527/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020145772025
Filing Number
EXA/14574/2025
Filing Date
06-May-2025
Registration No
EXA/1527/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOGTA FINANCIAL (INDIA) LTD.
Adv. Advocate Priya Rita
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHUDARAM MOTARAM GANTHILASAR
-
2.KANARAM MOTARAM MISTRY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Case Summary: EXA /1527/2025 SKIP The provided judgment document does not contain information specific to case EXA /1527/2025 (Kogta Financial vs. Dhudaram Motaram Ganthilasar and Kanaram Motaram Mistry). Instead, it is a consolidated order addressing multiple serial numbers (902-1151) based on the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision regarding unilateral arbitrator appointments. The case reference and parties mentioned in the assignment do not appear in this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
07-Aug-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1527/2025
Case Summary: EXA /1527/2025 SKIP The provided judgment document does not contain information specific to case EXA /1527/2025 (Kogta Financial vs. Dhudaram Motaram Ganthilasar and Kanaram Motaram Mistry). Instead, it is a consolidated order addressing multiple serial numbers (902-1151) based on the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision regarding unilateral arbitrator appointments. The case reference and parties mentioned in the assignment do not appear in this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts