Vipul Balbhadra Joshi Kalpesh Joshi Associates vs Sarla Pravin Kumar Sata — TP/2556/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020145752026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/14575/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2556/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vipul Balbhadra Joshi Kalpesh Joshi Associates

  2. 2.Niren Anant Mehta

    Adv. Kalpesh Joshi Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sarla Pravin Kumar Sata

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2556/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Division) called the petition for directions. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and ordered the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final hearing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2556/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2556/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Division) called the petition for directions. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and ordered the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final hearing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case