Anupam Engineers vs THE BRIHAN MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF OREA TER MUMBAI A — CARBP/567/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020144862026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/14486/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARBP/567/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anupam Engineers

    Adv. KISHORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE BRIHAN MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF OREA TER MUMBAI A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Case Summary: CARBP(L) No. 14330 of 2026 The Bombay High Court granted Anupam Engineers' petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The tribunal's original mandate had expired on May 8, 2026. The court extended it for one additional year until May 31, 2027, based on both parties' prior consent expressed in the March 16, 2026 meeting minutes and the stage of ongoing arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/567/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CARBP(L) No. 14330 of 2026 The Bombay High Court granted Anupam Engineers' petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The tribunal's original mandate had expired on May 8, 2026. The court extended it for one additional year until May 31, 2027, based on both parties' prior consent expressed in the March 16, 2026 meeting minutes and the stage of ongoing arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case