Anish Arvind Thakral vs Arvind S Thakral — MPT/563/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020144572026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

MPT/14457/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MPT/563/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anish Arvind Thakral

    Adv. Narendra Musale

  2. 2.Karishma Arvind Thakral

    Adv. NARENDRA RAMCHANDRA MUSALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arvind S Thakral

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: MPT/563/2026 Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The Bombay High Court issued a Legal Heirship Certificate to petitioners Anish Arvind Thakral and Karishma Arvind Thakral, certifying them as the only legal representatives of deceased Arvind S. Thakral under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/563/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MPT/563/2026 Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The Bombay High Court issued a Legal Heirship Certificate to petitioners Anish Arvind Thakral and Karishma Arvind Thakral, certifying them as the only legal representatives of deceased Arvind S. Thakral under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case