Anish Arvind Thakral vs Arvind S Thakral — MPT/563/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020144572026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

MPT/14457/2026

Filing Date

22-04-2026

Registration No

MPT/563/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Anish Arvind Thakral

Adv. Narendra Musale

Karishma Arvind Thakral

Adv. NARENDRA RAMCHANDRA MUSALE

Respondent(s)

Arvind S Thakral

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

23-04-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Case Summary: MPT/563/2026 Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The Bombay High Court issued a Legal Heirship Certificate to petitioners Anish Arvind Thakral and Karishma Arvind Thakral, certifying them as the only legal representatives of deceased Arvind S. Thakral under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MPT/563/2026 Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The Bombay High Court issued a Legal Heirship Certificate to petitioners Anish Arvind Thakral and Karishma Arvind Thakral, certifying them as the only legal representatives of deceased Arvind S. Thakral under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case