Ganesh Shivaji Mane vs ranjana Shivaji Mane — MPT/649/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020144202026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

MPT/14420/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MPT/649/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Shivaji Mane

    Adv. SUYASH S KALBHOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ranjana Shivaji Mane

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: MPT/649/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Ganesh Shivaji Mane's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Ranjana Shivaji Mane. The court declared Ganesh Shivaji Mane (son) and Kavya Kailas Desai (married daughter) as legal heirs and representatives of the deceased. The court directed the department to issue the heirship certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/649/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MPT/649/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Ganesh Shivaji Mane's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Ranjana Shivaji Mane. The court declared Ganesh Shivaji Mane (son) and Kavya Kailas Desai (married daughter) as legal heirs and representatives of the deceased. The court directed the department to issue the heirship certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case