Bombay Presidency Golf Club Ltd Khaitan and Co vs The State of Maharashtra, — WP/2568/2026
Case under Value Added Tax Act (Maharashtra) Section MaharashtraValueAddedTaxAct,20. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020144032026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/14403/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/2568/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
VALUE ADDED TAX ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bombay Presidency Golf Club Ltd Khaitan and Co
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra,
Adv. ,GP OS,GP OS,GP OS 1123
-
2.The Commissioner of Sales Tax
Adv. GP OS
-
3.The Sales Tax Officer
Adv. GP OS
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Case Summary: Bombay Presidency Golf Club Limited challenged provisions of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (as amended in 2024) as unconstitutional, alleging violations of Articles 246(3), 265, and 366(29A) of the Indian Constitution. The petition also sought interim relief restraining tax recovery. The High Court adjourned the case to 22 June 2026, granting the State two weeks to obtain instructions, with ad-interim relief to be considered at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2568/2026
Case Summary: Bombay Presidency Golf Club Limited challenged provisions of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (as amended in 2024) as unconstitutional, alleging violations of Articles 246(3), 265, and 366(29A) of the Indian Constitution. The petition also sought interim relief restraining tax recovery. The High Court adjourned the case to 22 June 2026, granting the State two weeks to obtain instructions, with ad-interim relief to be considered at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts