Sanjeev Prahaladrai Agrawal LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY vs Prahalad Rai Agrawal alias Agrawal Prabaladrai Sagarmal — TP/2463/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020143962026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/14396/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
TP/2463/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjeev Prahaladrai Agrawal LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prahalad Rai Agrawal alias Agrawal Prabaladrai Sagarmal
-
2.Meena Prahaladrai Agrawal
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/2463/2026 On 8th May 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) adjourned the testamentary petition filed by Sanjeev Prahaladrai Agrawal Lakdawala and Company. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify whether any cross-petitions were filed. The matter stands for final hearing once all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2463/2026
Case Summary: TP/2463/2026 On 8th May 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) adjourned the testamentary petition filed by Sanjeev Prahaladrai Agrawal Lakdawala and Company. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify whether any cross-petitions were filed. The matter stands for final hearing once all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts