S and G Steel Infra vs Hella Infra Market Ltd — CARAP/232/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020141732026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

CARAP/14173/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARAP/232/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S and G Steel Infra

    Adv. KIRAN MOHITE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hella Infra Market Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    Case Summary: CARAP /232/2026 The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Yash Kataria as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between S and G Steel Infra (claimant) and Hella Infra Market Ltd regarding unpaid amounts under two projects: Gauribidanur Project and Nayudupeta Project. Both parties consented to arbitration and the court found a valid arbitration agreement existed in the contracts. The tribunal will hold proceedings in Mumbai, with a preliminary meeting within two weeks, and all claims and counterclaims remain open for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 11

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARAP/232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CARAP /232/2026 The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Yash Kataria as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between S and G Steel Infra (claimant) and Hella Infra Market Ltd regarding unpaid amounts under two projects: Gauribidanur Project and Nayudupeta Project. Both parties consented to arbitration and the court found a valid arbitration agreement existed in the contracts. The tribunal will hold proceedings in Mumbai, with a preliminary meeting within two weeks, and all claims and counterclaims remain open for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case